Donald Trump
President Donald Trump meets with the Republican Study Committee on March 17, 2017.

After the Republican National Convention, the nominee, in an attempt to appeal for votes from the African-American community, began saying, “You’re living in poverty, your schools are no good, you have no jobs, and 58 percent of your youth is unemployed. What the hell do you have to lose?”

Needless to say, this was an unusual way of attempting to expand his political base among a constituency that has not shown much support for the GOP in recent years.

President Trump is perhaps the first political candidate to knowingly insult the very ones to whom he was appealing for votes. What also made these appeals to African-Americans outside of the norm, and even bizarre, is that they were often made before predominantly white audiences.

After reviewing the president’s first budget proposal, titled “America First: A Budget Blueprint to Make America Great Again,” his question of “What the hell do you have to lose?” can now be more broadly posed beyond African-Americans. Based on his fiscal priorities, many Americans, including a significant number of those who voted for him, stand to lose a great deal. Unfortunately for some, hell might seem like a better alternative than trying to survive under some of the president’s proposed cuts.

Take, for example, the Meals on Wheels Program. Truthfully, the president’s budget identified steep cuts in numerous domestic programs, but this particular one is not one of them. What it does call for, however, is the elimination of a key program that that Meals on Wheels groups depend on: a $3 billion program — community development block grants — begun under the Ford administration to combat poverty by giving states and cities greater flexibility in how to combat poverty.

Therefore, pain and hardship will be felt if Congress enacts the cuts. Meals on Wheels deliver food to individuals at home who are unable to purchase or prepare their own meals. The name is often used generically to refer to home-delivered meal programs, not all of which are actually named “Meals on Wheels.” Because they are housebound, many of the recipients, volunteers and even drivers are elderly.

Research has shown that home-delivered meal programs significantly improve diet quality, increase nutrient intakes and improve the quality of life among recipients. The program also reduces government expenditures by reducing the need of recipients to use hospitals, nursing homes or other expensive community-based services.

The new director of the Office of Management and Budget recently stated, “We can’t spend money on programs just because they sound good … to take the federal money and give it to the states and say, ‘Look we want to give you money for programs that don’t work.’”

Try telling someone no longer experiencing hunger pains due to Meals on Wheels that the program does not work.

President Trump is blessed to have never gone hungry a day in his life. However, I wish that he would visit with 56-year-old Linda Preast in Macon, Georgia.

During a recent interview on “CBS Evening News,” Ms. Preast was asked if she was surprised by the spending cuts to Meals on Wheels being proposed by the president.  She replied, “Yeah, because I was told – I was under the influence that he was going to help us.” The reporter then asked, “What would you tell him to convince him not to cut the program?” Ms. Preast responded, “What if it was your mama?”

Ms. Preast, who is white, poor and confined to a wheelchair due to a stroke, signed up for Meals on Wheels two years ago. Last November, she, as did the majority of the residents of Macon, voted for the president.

According to Robert A. Caro in his book “The Passage of Power: The Years of Lyndon Johnson,” the president loved the phrase “War on Poverty.” From personal knowledge, he knew that the causes of poverty stem from a “lack of education and training, in a lack of medical care and housing, in a lack of decent communities in which to live.” These were, to President Johnson, real-life foes. Poverty in America is Democratic, Republican, independent and nonvoting.

It is my hope that the 45th president will learn from his predecessor and find the compassion to use the bully pulpit to alleviate, and not compound, the pain currently being experienced by so many Americans, many who supported the president as well as many who did not.

So, Mr. President, what if it was your mama?

Cooper is president of Cooper Strategic Affairs, Inc.

WI Guest Author

This correspondent is a guest contributor to The Washington Informer.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.