**FILE** D.C. Council member Robert White (Roy Lewis/The Washington Informer)
**FILE** D.C. Council member Robert White (Roy Lewis/The Washington Informer)

The battle between D.C. Council member Robert White (D-At-large) and the D.C. Housing Authority (DCHA) reached new heights Thursday when White revealed whistleblower complaints made against the agency that have since been referred to the D.C. Office of the Inspector General. 

White, chairman of the D.C. Council Committee on Housing, said an ongoing investigation centers on allegations that a DCHA employee secured housing vouchers that unqualified friends and family used to move into Rise at Temple Courts in Northwest. 

Other cases involve an alleged conspiracy to steer voucher holders toward a particular building and prevent competitive contracts for a project. White said DCHA even fired an employee for refusing to take part in some of these schemes. He and the Stabilization and Reform Board, also known as the STAR Board, received reports about the complaints earlier this month. 

These allegations follow what White described as DCHA’s lack of cooperation with the D.C. Council Committee on Housing in the oversight process. He mentioned soon-to-come legislation designed to boost transparency within DCHA, though he declined to speak on the specifics. 

“When I see patterns of wrongdoing that require proactivity, we need to deal with it to change the culture and expectations,” White said. “There’s no path forward without instilling trust in the agency. It makes me so angry that people paired with taxpayer money have acted in self-interest. To the District residents who deserve DCHA to be high functioning, I see what you’re dealing with.” 

DCHA Executive Director Brenda Donald Responds 

Last year, DCHA’s compliance office found that the agency awarded nearly $1 million in illegally sourced contracts to a software company. That investigation followed the release of a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) report that revealed a systemic failure to maintain suitable housing for low-income residents. 

The STAR Board, installed via D.C. Council legislation last year, will soon approve a set of policy changes that the HUD recommended in its report last year. The policy changes serve as the starting point in strengthening processes for DCHA voucher participants and ensuring that public housing units are habitable.

On April 10, DCHA executive director Brenda Donald is scheduled to testify before the D.C. Council Committee on Housing where she’s expected to speak, not only about the progress made in relieving the backlog in affordable housing assignments, but steps her agency is taking to curb illegal activity. 

On Thursday, immediately following White’s press conference on the steps of the John A. Wilson Building in Northwest, Donald countered the notion that DCHA hadn’t been transparent in its dealings. 

With STAR Board Chair Raymond Skinner and Commissioner Rosa Burbridge standing next to her, Donald said DCHA was on track to inspect its entire affordable housing portfolio by June. Other gains she mentioned were the rehabilitation of 500 units within the last year and what she described as the net gain in public housing not seen in several years. 

In regard to the whistleblower allegations, Donald said such incidents don’t reflect on DCHA’s ability to serve District residents. 

“We take all allegations seriously. We’ve taken actions to refer to the inspector general,” Donald said. “We have a zero tolerance policy for fraud. This is not widespread corruption, just isolated incidents. We have employees who work hard and [there are] one or two bad apples. These… incidents stand on their own [and] it’s wrong and unfair [to judge] any [other] employees.” 

Elissa Silverman Points Out a Pattern 

For some people, including former D.C. Council member Elissa Silverman, recent revelations of malfeasance within DCHA count as part of a neverending story where working-class Washingtonians become further marginalized.

Toward the end of last year, Silverman, then an at-large D.C. council member, expressed her opposition to the formation of the STAR Board. She cited D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser’s plan to remove Bill Slover and other DCHA commission board members who had been vocal DCHA critics. 

Shortly before joining Council members Janeese Lewis George (D-Ward 4), Brooke Pinto (D-Ward 2) and Trayon White (D-Ward 8) in voting against the emergency legislation that would launch the STAR Board, Silverman demanded that the D.C. Council took greater and more permanent steps to guarantee accountability within DCHA. 

Those steps included DCHA’s establishment as a truly independent board, as outlined in legislation that Silverman and Pinto introduced weeks before the council approved STAR’s formation. 

While Silverman acknowledged that Donald inherited DCHA’s systemic failings, she said that Donald couldn’t escape responsibility for the recently alleged voucher fraud that’s taken place with her sitting at the helm. 

Additionally, Silverman took issue with Skinner supporting Donald when, in his capacity as chair of the STAR Board, he’s supposed to perform independent oversight of DCHA. 

That, for Silverman, further affirmed her stance about the STAR Board serving the mayor’s interests and not that of D.C. residents. That’s why in her capacity as a D.C. resident, Silverman continues to recommend that the D.C. Council takes DCHA from under the purview of the mayor and requires it to report to the D.C. Council as an independent agency. 

“Thousands of people depend on DCHA to get and maintain a safe place to live and call home. This is not some bureaucratic kerfuffle,” Silverman said. “People’s lives are impacted here. There’s an abuse of power in the voucher program and people were denied vouchers or still had to keep waiting. There was real-life human impact. Now that I’m off of the council, I’m tired of reading about District dysfunction without a solution.”

Sam P.K. Collins has more than a decade of experience as a journalist, columnist and organizer. Sam, a millennial and former editor of WI Bridge, covers education, police brutality, politics, and other...

Join the Conversation


  1. I think for the most part DCHA is doing the best they can I am a Housing Choice voucher holder and I’m managing with it so that I don’t have to worry about being in a shelter anymore, the only draw back is that I would love to live in an apartment or house where the amenities are new and spacious especially since I’m able to pay the rent asked for without assistance from the voucher program.

  2. I’m very disappointed of DC DH workers and overseas that use the housing program for their own gratification taking advantage of the washingtonians the workers in the government and the veterans of DC it don’t make no sense they got all these new buildings here in Washington DC and nobody living in them and then I see in Southeast DC brand new buildings built by their self and all a sudden all these DC workers from housing move in, And they made it look like it was a a program and they help somebody but we found out that these people was family members of housing moving into new buildings built with government money and separate from all the contracts that we see in DC they not just selling vouchers out here they building their own projects with government money and getting nice houses for their families, The system and housing it need to be rebuilt tore down and people need to work there that really cares about the people in the city and their jobs. And please stop using politics to cover your yourself and some of you politicians are not working for the city they are against the city counselorman.

  3. I knew something was terribly wrong. I have been on the list over 13 years or more. I would call and call and I would get the same response, I have been laughed at and just plane ignored. And, I still haven’t received any help. I pray that those who has been waiting for years like me get some help. I MEAN REAL HELP.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *