CommunityStacy M. Brown

D.C. Residents Struggle With Social Distancing: Study

The ongoing and growing protests demanding states reopen beaches, parks, and other public spaces; notwithstanding, social distancing remains the most effective way to prevent the spread of the coronavirus.

While some people may enjoy the opportunity to stay in more, many are negatively affected by the new constraints on their social life, jobs, exercise regimens, shopping opportunities, and more.

With more than a third of Americans saying the COVID-19 crisis has hurt their mental health, according to a recent poll from the American Psychiatric Association.

To find out where social distancing is most difficult, District-based personal finance company WalletHub compared the 50 states and the District of Columbia across 13 key metrics.

The data set ranges from whether residents have supportive relationships to how non-essential travel has changed due to the pandemic and how much consumers spent on social activities before COVID-19.

In addition to its report, WalletHub also released a “Social Distancing Survey,” which examines how Americans’ attitudes and behaviors have changed during this period of self-isolation.

The first study revealed that District residents might be among those who struggle the most with social distancing because the nation’s capital ranks first in money spent on social activities.

The District also ranked third — behind New Hampshire and South Dakota — in the longest time spent per day on socializing and communicating.

The District has the highest travel and tourism spending per capita in the nation, further underscoring that residents aren’t used to social distancing. “One issue I have thought about lately is the idea of ‘diffusion of benefits,'” said David Weisburd, a WalletHub expert and a Distinguished Professor in the Department of Criminology, Law and Society, and executive director of The Center for Evidence-Based Crime Policy at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia.

“This is a term that I developed with a colleague regarding crime prevention in the late 1990s,” Weisburd said. “What we noted is that many crime prevention efforts have unanticipated benefits that do not relate to the direct targets of the intervention.

“In prevention, that means that when you focus on a specific place, for example, other areas may improve as well,” he said. “I don’t think that there has been enough thinking as of late of the diffusion of benefits of the coronavirus prevention efforts — like reductions in crime, auto accidents, pollution, etc.

“On the other side, we also need to think about the increases in other problems like suicide, depression, etc.,” Weisburd said. “To gain a full view of the cost and benefits of this intervention, we have to take into account both diffusion and these negative consequences.

“And another issue that has struck me is that with all of the investment in medical research, our main prevention approach right now is for everyone to shut in at home,” he said. “It works, which is great, but the costs are tremendous, both socially and economically. Why haven’t we developed more sophisticated prevention or containment mechanisms? Why are we in this situation? It does seem that we could have done better.”

To view the complete study, click here.

Tags
Show More

Stacy M. Brown

I’ve worked for the Daily News of Los Angeles, the L.A. Times, Gannet and the Times-Tribune and have contributed to the Pocono Record, the New York Post and the New York Times. Television news opportunities have included: NBC, MSNBC, Scarborough Country, the Abrams Report, Today, Good Morning America, NBC Nightly News, Imus in the Morning and Anderson Cooper 360. Radio programs like the Wendy Williams Experience, Tom Joyner Morning Show and the Howard Stern Show have also provided me the chance to share my views.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Washington Informer Newspaper, 3117 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave SE, Washington, DC, 20032, http://www.washingtoninformer.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

Back to top button

My News Matters to me - Washington Informer Donations

Be a Part of The Washington Informer Legacy

A donation of your choice empowers our journalists to continue the work to better inform, educate and empower you through technology and resources that you use.

Click Here Today to Support Black Press and be a part of the Legacy!

Subscribe today for free and be the first to have news and information delivered directly to your inbox.


By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Washington Informer Newspaper, 3117 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave SE, Washington, DC, 20032, http://www.washingtoninformer.com. You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker