Paulette Matthews, vice president of the Barry Farm Tenants and Allies Association (Courtesy photo)
Paulette Matthews, vice president of the Barry Farm Tenants and Allies Association (Courtesy photo)

For more than a decade, public housing resident Paulette Matthews has made it a point to attend monthly meetings hosted by what was then known as the DC Housing Authority (DCHA) Board of Commissioners.

In 2019, Matthews moved from what used to be Barry Farm in Southeast to housing in Northwest. Long before then, Matthews, along with activists and other Barry Farm residents, challenged a redevelopment plan that would eventually displace them and scatter them throughout the D.C. metropolitan area. 

Once she settled into her new dwellings, Matthews saw problems similar to what she and other public housing residents experienced at Barry Farm, particularly building managers’ failure to address the crumbling infrastructure. Matthews recalled contractors doing patchwork repairs on floors and furnaces, rather than replacing them. 

Though she would eventually get her problems addressed, Matthews said it took a lot of persistence. 

In the aftermath of the dismantling of the Board of Commissioners last year, Matthews continued to maintain a presence at meetings that have since been conducted by the Stabilization and Reform Board, also known as the STAR Board. She along with other public housing residents weigh in on issues of concern and their comments become part of the public record. 

Even so, Matthews said that board members’ assurances that residents’ qualms get addressed don’t inspire much confidence in her that DCHA will do its job properly, especially when it comes to low-income and middle-income residents. 

“The mayor picked and chose who she wants, but the shenanigans continue,” said Matthews, who still serves as vice president of the Barry Farm Tenants and Allies Association. “The work orders aren’t being completed. They just [put a] band-aid [on] things. I will just be persistent. I’m not settling for that craziness. I go to board meetings and they’re talking about the same things from the last meeting.” 

The STAR Board Gets to Work 

In April, the STAR Board is scheduled to approve policy changes recommended in a report the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) released last year. 

DCHA Chief Operating Officer Rachel Joseph said that the policies serve as the starting point for eventually ensuring that DCHA is held accountable in strengthening business processes for voucher participants and making public housing units habitable. 

This upcoming resolution follows other moves made by the STAR Board since the new year. 

In March, the STAR Board unanimously approved a resolution to accept an additional $27 million from the Office of the Deputy Mayor for Planning and Economic Development that supports the redevelopment of Barry Farm. STAR also approved a contract with Solution Guidance Corporation of Chantilly, Va., one of eight candidates for the provider of a project management information system for DCHA’s portfolio of construction and development projects. 

These developments happened around the time that D.C. Council member Robert White (D-At large), chair of the D.C. Council’s Committee on Housing, requested that D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser (D) dedicates $100 million per year toward the repair and maintenance of public housing units. 

Last year, White counted among the nine council members who approved legislation dismantling the DCHA Board of Commissioners and replacing it with the STAR Board, a temporary entity that’s providing oversight of the agency’s plan to address the findings of the HUD report. 

Before Bowser and the D.C. Council moved forward with the STAR Board’s installment, DCHA’s board of commissioners consisted of 13 members, including the Deputy Mayor of Planning and Economic Development, six members appointed by the mayor, one appointed by the D.C. Council,  and a housing advocacy representative. 

The STAR Board on the other hand consists of 11 members, all of whom have been appointed by the mayor and approved by the D.C. Council. Those members include board chair Raymond Skinner, who’s former secretary of the Maryland Department of Housing and Community Development. Members include Denise Blackson and Rosa Burbridge, each of whom represent public housing residents as voting and nonvoting members, respectively. 

Meanwhile, Ronnie Harris represents the voucher program. She and the aforementioned STAR board members serve alongside representatives of the District’s Office of Budget and Performance Management and the Office of the Chief Financial Officer, in addition to other subject-matter experts

In the midst of the STAR Board’s work,  DCHA caught the ire of public housing residents and advocates earlier this year when DCHA Director Brenda Donald received a bonus of more than $41,000. The bonus came months after a damning internal audit of DCHA nearly caused Donald to resign.

Donald has been on record saying that she will not renew her contract with DCHA. Council member White the Informer earlier this month that installing a permanent director counts among the action steps in improving DCHA governance. 

White said a national search for a DCHA director should lead to the discovery of the “best and brightest leader” who has expertise in housing and management.

Since taking the helm of the D.C. Council’s Committee on Housing, White has conducted hearings and shepherded the passage of emergency legislation that requires DCHA to report certain financial and operating information, revises the training requirements for commissionaires and establishes training requirements for the executive director. The legislation also expands landlord-tenant consumer protections to DCHA. 

White said these steps go a long way in reestablishing DCHA’s rapport with the community.

“The agency can only move at the speed of trust,” White said as he touched on housing topics that he discusses with constituents. “We discuss voucher fraud and illegal procurement in public hearings. For things to keep moving in this direction, it’s going to take consistent work. I need the best and brightest to go to the DC Housing Authority — not as a sinking ship, but where they can do the best work.” 

Donald became DCHA executive director in 2021 after stints as director of D.C. Child and Family Services and deputy mayor for the Department of Health and Human Services. Despite criticism about public housing conditions in the wake of the Department of Housing and Urban Development report last year, Donald had been reported to say that DCHA housed more than 3,000 people in 18 months. 

Resident Wants More Say

For longtime public housing resident Aquarius Vann-Ghasri, Donald’s tenure represents the loss of resident empowerment in the areas of contract procurement and use of surplus funds received by each public housing community. 

In October, Vann-Ghasri, a resident of Potomac Gardens in Southeast, resigned from her role as a commissioner on the DCHA Board of Commissioners. She recalled making that move out of concern about the lack of transparency within DCHA, particularly as it relates to housing conditions and boosting resident participation in DCHA programming. 

Vann-Ghasri told the Informer that she didn’t support the dismemberment of the DCHA Board of Commissioners, as the board in that state represented an opportunity for residents to have some say so in public housing policy. 

As a DCHA commissioner of 17 years, Vann-Ghasri advocated for recreational activities and trips for public housing residents along with job training programs that allow residents to learn skills while repairing public housing. Another goal of Vann-Ghasri also centered on helping residents invest in community programs.  

Fulfilling those goals in this day and age, however, would be nearly impossible without greater synergy between residents and DCHA, Vann-Ghasri said. 

“The first thing that was taken away was the power of the residents to elect who they want on the board,” Vann-Ghasri said. “The policy will always go the mayor’s way. We’re the only housing authority in the United States that had [residents] as voting commissioners. We have programs but are they being attended by residents? These are [resources] that can be given to the unemployed and those who need a better future with training.”

Sam Plo Kwia Collins Jr. has nearly 20 years of journalism experience, a significant portion of which he gained at The Washington Informer. On any given day, he can be found piecing together a story, conducting...

Join the Conversation

4 Comments

  1. As a former Commissioner who choose not to campaign, after 17 years as an ELECT FAMILY COMMISSIONER, of the District of Columbia Housing Authority, with vacant units and uninhabitable and many of our units are in poor repairs and continuing to deteriorate. Communities of public housing are complex and crime in many are rampant and residents living in fear behind close doors.
    On May 19,95 the Receiver David Gilmore was given the power of his request, by 2000 the task Gilmore accomplish his five year public housing task of Transformation. I am the LAST COMMISSIONER OF THIS ERA. Not Commissioner Council . Though Commissioner Council not I is the LAST COMMISSIONER that served under the leadership of Former Director Brenda Donald.

    Today, I am monitoring whether or not our Housing Authority is staffed with ABLE MANAGERS? Committed STAFF working with up-to-date management systems and technology? WHETHER our residents are GIVEN A PLATFORM to decide HOW WE SHOULD LIVE, let alone WHERE WE SHOULD LIVE.
    I have experience having ENFORCED POLICIES TO REHABILITATE OCCUPIED UNITS
    Or REBUILT, I am a witness to seeing boarded -up apartment buildings have been torn down and replaced with beautiful townhouses.

    Our Newly Elect Director KEITH PETTIGEW, will and shall continue efforts to improve OR REPLACE OLD HOUSING.

  2. By Laws Amendments were are the challenge for the previous Board of Commissioner and for the STAR BOARD. The STAR BOARD AS OF YET have informed the public whether or not their board establish a By-Law Committee. Let alone have the board really supported the Amendment of the City Wide Advisory Board?
    Structure begin with analysis of your frame work. Every election I recommend a review of your Present and Past By -Laws.

  3. Vann-Ghasri, the former District of Columbia Housing Authority Family Elect Commissioner of 17 years is lecturing as a guest presenter, “WHOS 120, Leasing for Property Mgmt, taught by professor Karissa Spann. Vann-Ghasri infirm the students on the United States Citizens and Immigration Services (USCIS), the Immigrant Investor Program or EB-5, created by Congress in 1990 to stimulate the US economy through job creation and capital investment by foreign investors. Certain EB 5 visas are set adieu for investors, I’m regional centers designated by USCIS based on proposals for promoting economic growth. Vann-Ghasri, spoke on Qualifying projects, Types of EB-5 Investment, Funding of EB-5 , Terms of typical investment, and the history of the program of EB-5 .
    AND regional center sponsorship were identified and the location of the success of EB-5 in the District of Columbia. Resident Councils of the District of Columbia Housing Authority, depend only on the Office of Resident Service to education, a division created by previous Resident Councils.

  4. 17 years former District of Columbia Housing Authority Family Elect Commissioner Aquarius Vann-Ghasri does not understand why the recommendation she given is not being moved forward having the Mayor’s STAR Reform Board creating policy direction as follow for the purpose of improving the execution District of Columbia Housing Authority ‘s mission, being that information by Interim Director Dorian Jenkins, is relative to the agency’s overall performance. The agency’s strength and weaknesses noted in the Housing Urban Development Non-compliance report noted significant emerging problems. I am ask the Chair of the STAR board to call, of course he does not have any intention though he stated he would. I wanted to meet with him to explain why there is to be committes on the newly establish board such as:
    Research Committee for the purpose of examing all resolutions with problems such as Court Orders, Management and Maintenance- identify Maintenance to unit personnel units , examine vacancy rate, current and past work orders, number of court cases pending eviction, determine a corrective action for work order backlog..

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *