While on the campaign trail, Donald Trump openly declared he would rule as a dictator from his first day in office, and now, 15 House Democrats joined Republicans in passing a bill many say could empower the president-elect to do just that. 

The Stop Terror-Financing and Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act (H.R. 9495) grants the Treasury secretary unilateral authority to label nonprofits as โ€œterrorist supporting organizationsโ€ and strip them of their tax-exempt status without due process.

The measure passed the House on Thursday in a 219-184 vote.

Critics argue the legislation opens the door for abuse, with devastating consequences for free speech and democracy. 

Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) called the bill a step toward authoritarianism. 

โ€œA tyrant tightens his grip not just by seizing power but by demanding new powers and when those who can stop him willingly cede and bend to his will,โ€ Doggett said.

The provision has been compared to laws used by authoritarian regimes in countries like Hungary and Nicaragua, where similar measures have silenced dissent and forced aid organizations to close. Critics say it would allow any president to target nonprofits arbitrarily, bypassing judicial safeguards already in place.

The bill combines unrelated measures and includes tax-relief provisions for Americans held unjustly abroad. Opponents note that those provisions could easily be passed as standalone legislation without granting the Treasury Department new powers.

โ€œThis is not about fighting terrorism โ€” itโ€™s about handing Donald Trump the authority to decide who is a terrorist,โ€ Doggett said. โ€œOur democracy is under threat.โ€

Democratic Support Sparks Outrage

Despite clear warnings, 15 Democrats supported the measure, joining Republicans to advance what civil rights advocates have described as a โ€œdictatorโ€™s dream.โ€ 

Reps. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas) and Jared Golden (D-Maine) are among those facing backlash for their votes. Critics have also called out House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) for failing to rally his caucus more forcefully against the bill, though he voted against it.

Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) expressed disbelief at the decision to hand such power to an incoming Trump administration. 

โ€œThe road to fascism is paved with a million little votes that slowly erode our democracy and make it easier to go after anyone who disagrees with the government,” McGovern remarked.

Broad Criticism of Dangerous Consequences

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), along with over 180 organizations including Planned Parenthood and the NAACP, issued a scathing rebuke of the bill. They warned it could allow the Treasury to shut down nonprofits and aid organizations with little to no evidence.

Abby Maxman, CEO of Oxfam America, said similar laws in Nicaragua forced humanitarian groups to cease operations within days, leaving thousands without essential aid. 

โ€œWe have policies in place to ensure the assistance we provide gets to those in need,” Maxman remarked to reporters. “But all it takes is a sentence or a headline to associate an organization like ours with accusations that could ruin us.โ€

Some of the billโ€™s proponents have even acknowledged the risks. 

Rep. Brad Schneider (D-Ill.) proposed amendments to strengthen safeguards for nonprofits but stopped short of opposing the measure entirely. 

Critics, however, remain adamant that the bill represents an unnecessary and dangerous expansion of executive power.

โ€œThis legislation is not about terrorism,โ€ Doggett concluded as the bill now heads to the Senate. โ€œItโ€™s about empowering one man to destroy the organizations and voices he dislikes. This bill hands over unchecked power. Thatโ€™s not democracy โ€” itโ€™s tyranny.โ€

Stacy M. Brown is a senior writer for The Washington Informer and the senior national correspondent for the Black Press of America. Stacy has more than 25 years of journalism experience and has authored...

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *