Kyle Rittenhouse listens during his murder trial at the Kenosha County Courthouse in Kenosha, Wis., on Nov. 11. The 18-year-old is accused of killing two people and wounding a third during a protest over police brutality in Kenosha in August 2020.
Kyle Rittenhouse listens during his murder trial at the Kenosha County Courthouse in Kenosha, Wis., on Nov. 11. The 18-year-old is accused of killing two people and wounding a third during a protest over police brutality in Kenosha in August 2020.

Judge Bruce Schroeder has again issued a controversial ruling.

Just ahead of jury instructions, closing arguments, and juror deliberations, Schroeder on Monday dismissed a sixth count of Kyle Rittenhouse’s indictment, a misdemeanor charge for possession of a dangerous weapon by a person under 18.

The jury will now consider five charges against the now-18-year-old.

The dismissed charge could have added as much as nine months in prison to any sentence imposed upon Rittenhouse if he’s convicted. The charge also carries a $10,000 fine.

Schroeder’s rulings and actions have come under fire by many legal experts, who have cited the judge’s decision at the start of the trial to prohibit referring to the two people killed by Rittenhouse as “victims.”

“I’ve been fighting all my career with judges to not call people victims but that’s never happened,” said New Jersey attorney Robert Tarver.

Schroeder has also allowed Rittenhouse to essentially look over his shoulder at evidence, and provided extra time for the defendant to compose himself during testimony.

Here are the remaining charges for which the jury must deliberate:

– First-degree reckless homicide, use of a dangerous weapon – or that Rittenhouse recklessly caused the death of Rosenbaum under circumstances that showed utter disregard for human life.
– First-degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon – or that Rittenhouse recklessly endangered the safety of Richard McGinniss — a journalist with the conservative Daily Caller — under circumstances that show utter disregard for human life.
– First-degree intentional homicide, use of a dangerous weapon – or that Rittenhouse did cause the death of Huber, with intent to kill him.
– First-degree recklessly endangering safety, use of a dangerous weapon – or that Rittenhouse did recklessly endanger the safety of an unknown male, referred to as “jump kick man” in court, under circumstances that show utter disregard for human life.
– Attempted first-degree intentional homicide, use of a weapon – or that Rittenhouse attempted to cause the death of Grosskreutz, with intent to kill him.

Stacy M. Brown is a senior writer for The Washington Informer and the senior national correspondent for the Black Press of America. Stacy has more than 25 years of journalism experience and has authored...

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.