Supreme Court Will Hear Case Involving Life Sentences without Parole for Juveniles

Robert Barnes, THE WASHINGTON POST

WASHINGTON (The Washington Post)—The Supreme Court said Friday that it will decide whether hundreds of juvenile offenders sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole deserve a chance to be resentenced.

The court announced it will consider the case of a Louisiana man who said the court’s 2012 decision banning mandatory life sentences for juveniles must be applied retroactively.

The 5-to-4 ruling in Miller v. Alabama said that state laws mandating life in prison without the possibility of parole for those younger than 18 offend the Constitution’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment. That decision was part of a trend at the court of treating even the worst juvenile offenders differently from adults.

 
READ MORE

###

First Name

Last Name

Email address:

List choice Our House D.C. WIN Daily

Leave this field empty if you're human: