NationalStacy M. Brown

What Defunding Police Departments Means

On Friday, the Minneapolis City Council started a process that would eliminate the city’s police department as a charter department and create a new public safety organization.

The council also added a resolution to create the process allowing city staff to take steps toward developing what they call a “transformative new model” for public safety.

According to MPR News in Minneapolis, the city is required to fund a police department under the charter.

Still, if voters favor excising the police department from the charter, the council could then abolish it. A majority of council members have said they favor dismantling the police department.

Lawmakers in other jurisdictions around the nation have also discussed or have moved to defund police departments. For many, such action begs the question: What does defunding the police department means?

“Defunding the police is about the process of community involvement and reimagining the purpose of police, which leads to a different outcome,” activist Na’ilah Amaru said in an email to The Informer. “The phrase challenges American society to see fully the harm inflicted on Black and brown communities by current policies and practices that invest in a militarized police force while deliberately neglecting the needs, and divesting critical resources from communities of color.”

Traditionally, Americans equate the police with public safety. Still, police brutality and the disproportionate number of deaths of African-Americans at the hand of police demonstrate all-too powerfully that is not equally true for all segments of society, said Nora V. Demleitner, a Roy L. Steinheimer Jr. Professor of Law at Washington and Lee University in Virginia.

Overpolicing of African-American neighborhoods, exploitative tactics, stop-and-frisk abuses, and police brutality up to the murders of African-Americans show that the state’s power unequally — and sometimes brutally — falls upon a small and disenfranchised group in our population, Demleitner said.

“African-Americans as a group was historically enslaved, then suffered during segregation, and continue to be treated unequally in every walk of life, as health, education and wealth inequities powerfully demonstrate,” she said. “Let’s also acknowledge that police encounters, even if not themselves violent, often bring an unequal and overly punitive criminal justice response on minority communities, which creates further reluctance to rely upon the police. None of this is conducive to public safety.

“Defunding and even abolishing the police was discussed in passing during the 1960s as was prison abolition,” Demleitner said. “Those terms aren’t the same as lawlessness. It is about paring police functions back to their core. Police should be narrowly focused on law enforcement, especially as they carry weapons and should be subject to robust constraints on their power and vibrant oversight and accountability.

Discussions began last week about whether school resource officers (SROs) are necessary in Prince George’s County public schools.

The school seeks to remove those officers from school buildings and amend the budget already passed by County Council to use $5 million to hire more mental health professionals, social workers, and counselors.

Even if the school board approved to no longer have SROs, a Maryland law adopted in 2018 requires all school systems to provide adequate “law enforcement coverage.”

Each school system must report any life-threatening incidents on school grounds, hire a school safety coordinator, and assess students’ behavioral and mental health services.

County Executive Angela Alsobrooks said she understands the need to provide more mental health services for students, but they also deserve to be safe.

“Our children … our teachers, our administrators, and any other person in those school buildings deserve as much as we can offer them,” she said. “I don’t believe in withdrawing school resource officers would be in the best interest of our students, our teachers, administrators. [Students] deserve to be safe and secure and to have those other services that are suggested.”

The police are increasingly tasked to be engaged in all kinds of problem-solving. In resolving issues, other entities can do better, added Demleitner, who is also a chaired law professor and lead author of the casebook on Sentencing Law and Policy.

Mental health counselors, not armed police, should be sent when someone has a psychotic break, and teachers and principals, not armed police, should resolve school disputes, Demleitner said.

“Traffic accidents don’t require armed police. And certainly directing traffic doesn’t demand armed police,” the professor said. “We can allocate all those tasks to where they should belong and fund those entities with the resources currently allocated to the police. Public safety would not be harmed, but the footprint of our criminal legal system would shrink dramatically. That would be a salutary development.”

Demleitner noted that an additional component is the militarization of police. Police departments have generously benefited from federal grants to buy military-style equipment, some of which are now used against peaceful protesters.

Removing these funds is a vital aspect of defunding, Demleitner said.

“Calls to defund the police are about re-allocating resources, about shifting the focus off of criminal enforcement toward greater equality and welfare for all,” she said.

WI staff writer William Ford contributed to this story.

Stacy M. Brown

I’ve worked for the Daily News of Los Angeles, the L.A. Times, Gannet and the Times-Tribune and have contributed to the Pocono Record, the New York Post and the New York Times. Television news opportunities have included: NBC, MSNBC, Scarborough Country, the Abrams Report, Today, Good Morning America, NBC Nightly News, Imus in the Morning and Anderson Cooper 360. Radio programs like the Wendy Williams Experience, Tom Joyner Morning Show and the Howard Stern Show have also provided me the chance to share my views.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Yes, I would like to receive emails from Washington Informer Newspaper. Sign me up!

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Washington Informer Newspaper, 3117 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave SE, Washington, DC, 20032, You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

Back to top button

My News Matters to me - Washington Informer Donations

Be a Part of The Washington Informer Legacy

A donation of your choice empowers our journalists to continue the work to better inform, educate and empower you through technology and resources that you use.

Click Here Today to Support Black Press and be a part of the Legacy!

Subscribe today for free and be the first to have news and information delivered directly to your inbox.

By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Washington Informer Newspaper, 3117 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave SE, Washington, DC, 20032, You can revoke your consent to receive emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker